Hardwood Prices(888) 430-7274

Purchase calculations

Worked purchasing examples use hypothetical quantities and prices to explain unit conversion and scope. They are not live quotes or promises of availability.

01

Hardwood pricing units: board feet, linear feet and square feet

A fictional offer of $5 per LF and another of $10 per SF are not directly ranked. If the SF billing basis is 5.5 inches wide, the second rate corresponds geometrically to about $4.58 per LF before other charges. Different billing widths or excluded services change that comparison.

What should be checked?
  • Each price has an explicit billing unit.
  • Billing dimensions are separate from finished coverage.
  • The material scopes are comparable.
  • Freight, tax and fees are included or explicitly excluded.
Work through the decision ↗
02

Nominal, actual and billing dimensions

Two offers both use a 1×6 product label, but one quotes a different effective face after profiling. The buyer records each actual coverage separately. The price per usable square foot can change even when both offers have the same dollars per linear foot.

What should be checked?
  • Nominal labels identify rather than prove dimensions.
  • Actual supplied dimensions are documented.
  • The supplier explained billing measurement and rounding.
  • Coverage uses the correct installed face.
Work through the decision ↗
03

What a comparable lumber quote should include

Offer A includes milling and specified lengths; Offer B prices an unprocessed random-length pack. The buyer asks for a scope revision or records the additional services separately. Comparing the two material totals alone would hide the work still required.

What should be checked?
  • The material description is complete.
  • Quantity and length requirements are explicit.
  • Services and exclusions are listed.
  • Validity and delivery assumptions are recorded.
Work through the decision ↗
04

Calculating delivered hardwood cost

A fictional material subtotal of $4,000 plus $300 freight and $120 other charges totals $4,420 before tax. Another quote includes delivery in its material amount. The comparison separates the components rather than adding freight twice to the inclusive offer.

What should be checked?
  • Delivery scope and destination type match.
  • Unloading responsibility is clear.
  • Tax uses the actual quote basis or a labeled assumption.
  • Included delivery is not counted a second time.
Work through the decision ↗
Try your own inputs